Hi, it's me again. Sorry to keep this up, but this homo infuriated me so much that I've decided to pick apart a few pieces of his statement to the troops. I'll do the gay paste and respond thing, so here we go: "We remember the road to Basra -- the Highway of Death -- where we were ordered to kill fleeing Iraqis. We bulldozed trenches, burying people alive." What's wrong with that? There's nothing that says you can't kill a retreating enemy. These Iraqis had just raped, looted, and torched much of Kuwait, and were trying to escape to fight another day. So what do we do, allow them to escape with their military hardware intact so it can be used again in the future, or destroy as much of it as we can? Logical choice people. Also, bulldozing trenches, burying people alive, again, that's war. People die. "You should think about what your "mission" really is. You are being sent to invade and occupy a people who, like you and me, are only trying to live their lives and raise their kids. They pose no threat to the United States even though they have a brutal dictator as their leader. Who is the U.S. to tell the Iraqi people how to run their country when many in the U.S. don't even believe their own President was legally elected?" - This was obviously written by a bitter democrat who simply won't let go of the fact that Al Gore lost the election. Bush broke no law getting elected people. Those votes were counted again, and again, and each time Bush was the winner. It was all done by the Constitution, sorry folks, he's your president, get used to it. As for Iraq posing no threat to the United States, see my previous posts. "However, when Saddam committed his worst crimes the U.S. was supporting him. This support included providing the means to produce chemical and biological weapons." - Okay, I don't recall the US ever cheering him on as he gassed a million of his own people. It is true, we provided him with weapons, but that's because he was at war with Iran, our enemy at the time. Saddam Hussein supported American interests in the area, so we scratched his back in return. It's easy to say that was a big mistake, however hindsight is 20/20, and we had no idea he was going to use those weapons in an offensive rather than a defensive manner. This guy makes it sound like President Reagan was sitting in the Oval Office one day saying, "Well, I'd sure like to see those bastard Kurds get gassed, what say we send that old boy Saddam some chemical weapons!" "Contrast this with the horrendous results of the U.S. led economic sanctions. More than a million Iraqis, mainly children and infants, have died because of these sanctions. After having destroyed the entire infrastructure of their country including hospitals, electricity generators, and water treatment plants, the U.S. then, with the sanctions, stopped the import of goods, medicines, parts, and chemicals necessary to restore even the most basic necessities of life." - Okay, number one, no US troops were given the order to bomb hospitals. Bombing civilian hospitals serves no military purpose. And as I recall the sanctions allow oil to be sold for vital supplies such as food and medicine. It's not our fault that Saddam horded the money and supplies coming in to support his war machine and keep the population dependent on the government. "When, in an unjust war, a thousand poor farmer conscripts die in a trench defending a town they have lived in their whole lives, it is not victory, it is murder." - I wonder what a just war would be to the asshole who wrote this? Most people would agree that WWII was a just war. But in that war we firebombed entire cities to the ground. We didn't have the technology to make accurate strikes against military targets. We didn't have smart bombs back then. So we carpet bombed whole cities to dust. But was this unjust? I don't think so, it was just the way war was waged back then. Would this guy prefer we did it the old way? In the end it was justified because without that kind of air power we would have lost the war, plain and simple. And since then the United States has done more to minimalize civilian casualties than any other country. Do you think people in the Middle East, or Asia, or Africa fight like that? Do you think they differentiate between civilians and combatants? So some civilians died in Vietnam. So what, you should have seen the things the Vietcong did to people. They were some of the most brutal fighters in history. And because Americans received so little support from anti-war protesters like this sicko, we had to fight with one hand tied behind our back, without a clear plan of objectives, and without the number of troops and equipment needed to get the job done. Our men were sent in ill-equipped to a savage Jungle where seemingly innocent villagers could kill you in your sleep. Where the enemy burrowed in caves right beneath your feet, and could sneak out at night to slit your throat. Does this asshole think he could have kept his mind in that environment? "During the Vietnam War thousands in Vietnam and in the U.S. refused to follow orders. Many resisted and rebelled. Many became conscientious objectors and others went to prison rather than bear arms against the so-called enemy." - And those who rebelled were traitors and deserved to be shot. You don't abandon your comerades in battle because you sympathize with the communist Vietnamese. Did you know in WWII there were people who objected to fight? So what did they do? They served as medics, or truck drivers, or cooks. They still helped out, and many of them still died. But they still supported our fighting men. "If the people of the world are ever to be free, there must come a time when being a citizen of the world takes precedence over being the soldier of a nation." -If this guy isn't a communist I don't know who is. This guy obviously believes in a utopian one-world government where there are no borders between states, and there are no sovereign nations. This guy jerks off when he reads 1984. "we have come to understand that our REAL duty is to the people of the world and to our common future." -No, your real duty is to your family, to your country and to your culture. Your own people are more important than the rest of the world, stop being ashamed of it. Do you think countries like France or Russia or China give a shit about what "the world community" think? Of course not, they do what they want to do. The day our Constitution takes backseat to some one-world government like the UN will be a sad day for humanity. And speaking of humanity, is the rest of the world going to really be that different as a result of this war? None of these anti-war liberals are going to be affected in any way. They're not going to lose money, they're not going to be killed in battle, so what are they so worried about? The Iraqi people will be liberated, and we'll have one less terrorist-friendly psycho to worry about. Sounds like a good deal to me. Okay, I think I'm done for now. Seka, you should get a messageboard soley to post my rants. from Pharaoh [email] [homepage] 4:33 am - Tuesday,March 11, 2003

Oh yeah, another thing. I would think you people would have learned after Vietnam how devastating lack of morale can be to our troops in the field. Encouraging this dissention does absolutely nothing to help our fighting men. How many lives were lost in Vietnam because our country wouldn't rally behind our soldiers and marines? The last thing these brave fighters need to see is that millions of you anti-American commies think of them as brutal murderers for doing their duty. That diminishes morale, and lack of morale costs lives. But I guess Iraqis are more important than Americans. from Pharaoh [email] [homepage] 6:28 pm - Monday,March 10, 2003

That statement to the troops is one of the most sickening things I've read this week. A traitor wrote that, and he should be hanged. So we killed a few Commie North Vietnamese? Pass me a tissue. Member of the World Community? Good, get out of my country and join the world. Whatever happened to being a sovereign nation? I guess in your socialist utopia there is no such thing. We must be "World citizens" before we are Americans? Go to Geneva, you don't belong in the United States. And this bullshit about 1 in 4 Gulf war veterans being disabled? What crap. My brother was in the Gulf War, and most of them came home just fine. Any soldier who decides to be a world citizen and goes against the order to defend his country should be shot in front of the troops. There is no place for traitors, and that's what this red diaper pot smoking commie scum draftee who wrote this is. He'd be wise to remember that the world would be a brutal and savage place were it not for the United States. Name a single country that has done more to help the world. Name 10 countries combined that have done more. The more I see this the more I wish we had let Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan ravage all of Europe and Asia. You'd all be lamp shades were it not for American soldiers "murdering" other people. This is the thanks we get? Civilians die in war, it's a fact, accept it. If keeping deadly weapons out of the hands of terrorists who mean to use them against me and my people means an Iraqi father has to die of a heart attack because the phone line was cut, tough shit. It's us or them, if you don't like it, LEAVE. There are plenty of like-minded Communist countries like France or Germany or Russia or China who will gladly welcome you. The so-called "veterans" who put up that web page should be tried for treason for aiding and comforting the enemy and shot. If they didn't want to kill people, why did they join the military? That's what soldiers do. Kill people. That's what they have always done. Don't pretend we are so evolved that we are above war. War is human nature, it will ALWAYS be around, it is sometimes necessary, as it is now, so stop being such a bunch of leftist pussies and shut your fucking piss-soaked mouths. Nobody's asking you to fight. I have more respect for the "evil American murdering soldier" who kills for his country than these piece of shit war protesters with rich mommies and daddies who drive around in their SUV's and go to universities and live off the rich bounty those "murderous" american soldiers gave their lives to acquire. We'd all be nothing were it not for them. This country was forged in the heat of battle, and we have saved the world time and time and time again by fighting wars. I hope a plane crashes into these people's houses. There is overwhelming focus here on the killing of children, as though our troops are going to march right through the armed Iraqis, into the nearest school, and open up on the students during Math class. More children die under Saddam Hussein every fucking year than will be killed by American and British forces. Don't you fucking get that? You peacenicks are students of Chamberlain. And we all know how his policy of appeasement ended up. I personally witnessed the two towers fall. I watched MY people get murdered. I smelled the foul air and saw the sun blocked out by the cloud of dust. If a few Iraqis have to die to prevent that from happening again, so be it. Throw in a few Commie North Koreans and Iranians in there too. See if I care. I'm an American first, "world citizen" second. It's a kill are be killed world, wake up from your utopian dreams. Stop being such a cowardly bunch, support our troops in battle, and shut the fuck up. from Pharaoh [email] [homepage] 5:27 pm - Monday,March 10, 2003

hehehe i have a new favorite poem from cody [email] [homepage] 6:43 pm - Saturday,March 8, 2003

i'm betting on smallpox. r u going to tell us at any point? I'm not sure though b/c I have yet to actually notice the scars. I shall take a closer look later from delphine [email] [homepage] 6:55 pm - Wednesday,March 5, 2003

Yes, I agree with you about Hussein's nut son probably being even more dangerous than Hussein himself. But as for North Korea, they are clearly the biggest immediate threat we face, so let's get this Iraq thing over with so we can deal with them quickly. North Korea is known to regularly deal with terrorists, and their ability to produce many nuclear weapons should be terrifying, considering they can easily put a warhead into a box, sneak it into the country and detonate it in one of our cities. And if it's New York, you can say goodbye to me. I live within only 20 direct miles of the city, and if an exploding oil barge in the harbor was powerful enough to shake the windows of my house the other day, a nuke will vaporize me. It is essential we take out Korea quickly. If i had my way, I'd go after them first, Saddam second, but since we're already in the Gulf, we might as well follow through. Besides, they're communists, and we owe them from the 50's. from Pharaoh [email] [homepage] 8:50 pm - Monday,February 24, 2003

yah lets piss off the boys with the nukes :-p i will say that im all for not letting saddams crazy ass son take power from cody [email] [homepage] 5:04 pm - Monday,February 24, 2003

Well, rest assured, when Saddam is removed, the embargo will also be removed, and then no more children will be dying as a result of lack of sewage treatment chemicals. And then we will be free to go to Asia to kill North Koreans. from Pharaoh [email] [homepage] 1:29 am - Monday,February 24, 2003

its not about the embargo, its about the people who die as a result there are many very useful chemicals, the main one ive heard mentioned is sewage cleaning chemicals, that would tremendously improve the situatioin in iraq for the people but paranoia about saddam and his weapons programs has kept many supplies from getting through, the same reason osama dislikes saddam, to him its about the people, mostly children, who die because of both us and saddam from cody [email] [homepage] 8:43 pm - Sunday,February 23, 2003

Holy cow! Well, I'm surely not going to write as much as some of your friends. I just wanted to sign in and show you that Mommy cares! from Your Mother [email] [homepage] 9:45 pm - Thursday,February 20, 2003

older guestbook entries: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

sign my guestbook here:

your name:
your email:
your url:
your message:

Back to my site